
Vulnerability scanning that protects attorney-client privilege
11 automated scanners continuously test your client portals, case management systems, and document repositories. AI prioritizes findings so your firm fixes the most dangerous gaps first.


Security Built for Law Firms
Privileged Data Protection
Sensitive file detection scans for exposed case documents, contracts, and privileged communications. Cloud bucket checks catch misconfigured S3 and Azure storage holding client data.
Case Management System Security
CVE scanning and port detection across Clio, NetDocuments, iManage, and custom case management platforms. Find unpatched vulnerabilities before they compromise case data.
Client Portal Hardening
Security header checks, SSL/TLS verification, and vulnerability scanning on every client-facing document portal. Ensure the systems clients trust are actually secure.
DNS & Email Security
DNS security scanning verifies SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records protecting your firm's email domain. Prevent spoofing attacks that target clients with fraudulent communications.
Brand & Impersonation Monitoring
Brand monitoring detects lookalike domains impersonating your firm. Catch phishing sites targeting your clients or partners before damage is done.
ABA Compliance Evidence
Generate security posture reports for ABA Model Rule 1.6 obligations and client due diligence requests. Demonstrate reasonable security measures with scan history and remediation records.
How It Works
Add Assets
Register your firm's domains, client portals, and cloud infrastructure. FortWatch discovers subdomains and exposed services automatically.
Scan
11 scanners run continuously — CVEs, exposed documents, SSL gaps, DNS misconfigurations, cloud buckets, and lookalike domains.
Prioritize
AI ranks findings by severity and exploitability. Your team sees the biggest threats to client data first, not noise.
Remediate
Follow step-by-step fix guidance. Track issues to closure and export reports for compliance and client assurance.
External Attack Surface for Law Firms and Legal Teams
Law firms concentrate exactly what attackers want behind a thin perimeter: privileged client communications, merger and litigation strategy, sealed settlements, IP filings, and trust-account banking details. The public-facing footprint is usually small but high-value and chronically under-maintained — a marketing site on WordPress, a client portal or extranet for document exchange, secure file-transfer endpoints, a webmail or Exchange/OWA login, a VPN or remote-desktop gateway, and a long tail of practice-area microsites and event subdomains spun up by vendors and never decommissioned.
The recurring exposure patterns are mundane and that is the problem. Document portals and DMS integrations get stood up on subdomains that outlive the engagement, leaving dangling DNS records ripe for subdomain takeover. Self-hosted file-transfer appliances (the MOVEit and Accellion class of product the legal sector has repeatedly been breached through) sit on the open internet with management interfaces and known CVEs. Backups, case exports, and discovery material land in misconfigured S3/GCS/Azure buckets. And small firms running their own mail are prime business-email-compromise targets when SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are missing or set to monitor-only — wire-transfer fraud against real-estate and trust accounts is one of the sector's most common and costly incidents.
Brand and lookalike risk is acute here because so much firm business runs over email and wire instructions. Typosquatted and homoglyph domains are registered to impersonate a firm to its clients and opposing counsel, then used for invoice and closing-funds fraud. External scanning maps this surface — every live host, port, certificate, exposed file, takeover-able subdomain, public bucket, and registered lookalike — but it is honest about its limits: it sees what the internet can reach, not the contents of your DMS, internal network, or the human-targeted phishing that often delivers the final blow.
Compliance this supports
How continuous external scanning maps to the frameworks teams in this sector report against.
Formal Opinion 477R requires reasonable safeguards for client data in transit and at rest; external scans evidence TLS strength, security headers, and exposed-file checks as part of reasonable measures.
A 40-attorney litigation firm ran a client extranet at portal.firmname.com, hosted on a managed file-transfer appliance that a vendor set up two years earlier. The vendor moved on; the subdomain's DNS record stayed. A new critical CVE landed for that appliance, and its admin interface was still reachable from the internet on a non-standard port. FortWatch's port scan flagged the exposed management interface, Nuclei matched the unpatched version against the known CVE, and the DNS scanner noted that DMARC was set to p=none — so even if attackers impersonated the firm by email, nothing would block it. The firm patched the appliance and locked the admin port to office IPs within a day, then moved DMARC to quarantine. Two weeks later a typosquat domain, firmnarne.com, appeared in the brand monitor — registered the same week the patch went out, primed to send fake closing-wire instructions to clients. Because the firm had already tightened email authentication and warned clients, the spoofing attempt bounced instead of redirecting a six-figure escrow transfer.
Explore other industries
View all →Secure your entire stack today
Start scanning in under 5 minutes. No credit card required. 14-day free trial included.


